POLLY TO MR DIXON TEAMPOLY

Polly to Mr Dixon Teampoly- rules of the debate

From: APTCIG HQ
To: Richie Dixon Managing Director Teampoly

Dear Mr Dixon,

My apologies for setting you up in a debate without giving you any idea of how the Debate is going to work. We have been so busy here at APTCIG HQ preparing our Peoples Court to do battle with your Association leader's Court of Law challenge that it completely slipped my mind. My apologies again.

The Debate is going to work like this:

All debaters must communicate through the Central Administrator (me). So, our leader Mr Matthews has challenged you with a question (twice it so appears) so now you must respond directly back to him. My job as Debate Adjudicator is to see the all the Rules of the Debate are followed (which reminds me I must get a list of rules together and distribute or there'll other debaters in a tizz wondering what to do).

Posted comments are reserved for the audience only and can be from any silly identifier like 'easily frustrated with idiots' or even 'anonymous'. You must come out into the open and meet your debater face to face. You cannot hide behind anonymity and hope to get away with it, not that I think you would of course.

The gathering audience is waiting for your response Mr Dixon. Please don't make them wait too long. They have a lot of other debates our leader is lining up they will be wanting to go to as well.

Yours in adjudicology,
Polly F Leen (Miss) ,BAdj U of M
Debate Adjudicator(cum APTCIG secretary)
-----------------------------------------------